<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RadioBarachois &#187; News and information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radiobarachois.net/category/news-and-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radiobarachois.net</link>
	<description>News From Saint-Pierre &#38; Miquelon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:52:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Missile Not From Saint-Pierre &amp; Miquelon</title>
		<link>http://www.radiobarachois.net/2010/01/28/missile-not-from-saint-pierre-miquelon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.radiobarachois.net/2010/01/28/missile-not-from-saint-pierre-miquelon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newfoundland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News and information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saint-pierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[st pierre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiobarachois.net/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Was the object seen in the skies above Newfoundland a French missile launched from Brittany?
The rocket or missile that appeared in the sky over Newfoundland did not originate in Saint-Pierre and Miquelon. Any reports claiming so are erroneous. The islands do not have any permanent military presence except for a small coast guard vessel.

It is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.radiobarachois.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/nl-ufo-012710.jpg" alt="" width="392" height="221" /></p>
<p>Was the object seen in the skies above Newfoundland a French missile launched from Brittany?</p>
<p>The rocket or missile that appeared in the sky over Newfoundland did not originate in Saint-Pierre and Miquelon. Any reports claiming so are erroneous. The islands do not have any permanent military presence except for a small coast guard vessel.<span id="more-73"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.radiobarachois.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/missile.jpg" alt="" width="420" height="151" /></p>
<p>It is likely that missile tests conducted over the North Atlantic by a French submarine based in Brittany are the cause of these sightings.</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: left;">French reports
<ul>
<li style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h2a4HkelmwgQ_IG7iKBrRcPNTCAg">Agence France Presse</a></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.ouest-france.fr/ofdernmin_-Premier-tir-d%E2%80%99essai-reussi-du-missile-M51-depuis-le-sous-marin-Le-Terrible_42314-1241554-pere-tous_filDMA.Htm">Ouest- France</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Canadian reports
<ul>
<li style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.vocm.com/newsarticle.asp?mn=2&amp;id=3930&amp;latest=1">VOCM Radio</a></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2010/01/27/nl-ufo-military-012710.html">CBC Newfoundland &amp; Labrador</a></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5i94OG7u8VdT5RIJxgTFYW2WA15PA">Canadian Press</a></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/GSN_20080328_3CE6A59A.php">National Post</a></li>
<li style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/GSN_20080328_3CE6A59A.php">Global Security Newswire</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Photo  Darlene Stewart, Harbour Mile, Newfoundland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radiobarachois.net/2010/01/28/missile-not-from-saint-pierre-miquelon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBC’s anti-French propaganda</title>
		<link>http://www.radiobarachois.net/2009/05/13/cbc%e2%80%99s-anti-french-propaganda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.radiobarachois.net/2009/05/13/cbc%e2%80%99s-anti-french-propaganda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 05:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continental shelf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disinformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mansbridge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiobarachois.net/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Mansbridge, of the National, reported on the Continental Shelf issue South of the islands of Saint-Pierre et Miquelon in a misleading and inflammatory manner (May 12, 2009 : 19:00 to 19:34). Using incorrect graphics, the newscaster displayed a complete lack of objectivity by qualifying the French claim as a “threat”. Such inflammatory rhetoric has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-48" title="seabed2" src="http://www.radiobarachois.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/seabed2-150x150.jpg" alt="seabed2" width="150" height="150" />Peter Mansbridge, of the <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/national/">National</a>, reported on the Continental Shelf issue South of the islands of Saint-Pierre et Miquelon in a misleading and inflammatory manner (May 12, 2009 : 19:00 to 19:34). Using incorrect graphics, the newscaster displayed a complete lack of objectivity by qualifying the French claim as a “<strong>threat</strong>”. Such inflammatory rhetoric has no other purpose but to stir public opinion against the islands and France.<span id="more-44"></span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">An approximate transcript of the commentary by Peter Mansbridge : &#8220;<em>An update on that international dustup over the seabed off of Newfoundland. France has made good on its <strong>threat</strong> and filed letter of intent with the United Nations., laying claim to a vast energy rich section of ocean. France says its rights extend beyond the 200 nautical mile mark of its territory Saint Pierre and Miquelon. It wants its boundary to <strong>extend</strong> all the way to the continental shelf. Canada maintains the dispute was settled years ago by the international court of arbitration. </em>&#8220;</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-47" title="seabed1" src="http://www.radiobarachois.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/seabed1-300x168.jpg" alt="seabed1" width="240" height="134" />The graphic used in the newscast would lead anyone to believe France and Saint-Pierre et Miquelon want to rescind the 1992 arbitration, yet there is nothing in the documents filed by France that makes any such claim.</p>
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li><a href="http://www.ump975.net/documents/Plateau-continental/Lettre-Intention-SecretraireGeneralNationsUnies.pdf">French letter of intent</a> (pdf)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.ump975.net/documents/Plateau-continental/Infos_preliminaires_plateau_francais_2009_Saint_Pierre_et_Miquelon_FR.pdf">French preliminary supporting documents</a> (pdf)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radiobarachois.net/2009/05/13/cbc%e2%80%99s-anti-french-propaganda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada’s claim invalidated by The Economist</title>
		<link>http://www.radiobarachois.net/2009/05/07/canada%e2%80%99s-claim-invalidated-by-the-economist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.radiobarachois.net/2009/05/07/canada%e2%80%99s-claim-invalidated-by-the-economist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continental shelf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falklands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radiobarachois.net/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Britain’s top economic and political magazine has just published an article about Saint-Pierre and Miquelon’s claim to the continental shelf.
Without the shadow of a doubt, the Economist invalidates Canada’s claim the issue was settled in 1992: “It (Canada) said, wrongly, that the matter had been settled by arbitration in 1992 and that it would – [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="float: right;" src="http://www.radiobarachois.com/wp-content/uploads/illus/economist.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="196" />Britain’s top economic and political magazine has just published an article about Saint-Pierre and Miquelon’s claim to the continental shelf.</p>
<p>Without the shadow of a doubt, the Economist invalidates Canada’s claim the issue was settled in 1992: “It (Canada) said, wrongly, that the matter had been settled by arbitration in 1992 and that it would – take all necessary measures to defend and protect its rights. – (Canada has until 2013 to file its claim.) In fact the 1992 decision fixed the maritime boundaries between Canada and the islands, and did not demarcate the continental shelf.”</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.economist.com/world/americas/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13611528">The Economist, May 7th 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radiobarachois.net/2009/05/07/canada%e2%80%99s-claim-invalidated-by-the-economist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
