Canada’s claim invalidated by The Economist

Britain’s top economic and political magazine has just published an article about Saint-Pierre and Miquelon’s claim to the continental shelf.

Without the shadow of a doubt, the Economist invalidates Canada’s claim the issue was settled in 1992: “It (Canada) said, wrongly, that the matter had been settled by arbitration in 1992 and that it would – take all necessary measures to defend and protect its rights. – (Canada has until 2013 to file its claim.) In fact the 1992 decision fixed the maritime boundaries between Canada and the islands, and did not demarcate the continental shelf.”

Source: The Economist, May 7th 2009

Une réponse to “Canada’s claim invalidated by The Economist”

  1. British claims to the continental shelf resemble French claims. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/11/uk-falklands-argentina-un

Un commentaire ?

Dans la même rubrique :

  • Missile Not From Saint-Pierre & Miquelon »  Was the object seen in the skies above Newfoundland a French missile launched from Brittany? The rocket or missile that appeared in the sky over Newfoundland did not originate in Saint-Pierre and Miquelon. Any reports claiming so are erroneous. The islands do not have any permanent military presence except for a small coast guard vessel. It is [...]
  • CBC’s anti-French propaganda » Peter Mansbridge, of the National, reported on the Continental Shelf issue South of the islands of Saint-Pierre et Miquelon in a misleading and inflammatory manner (May 12, 2009 : 19:00 to 19:34). Using incorrect graphics, the newscaster displayed a complete lack of objectivity by qualifying the French claim as a “threat”. Such inflammatory rhetoric has [...]
  • St-Pierre and Miquelon Continental Shelf FAQ »  Why are these islands not part of Canada? Canada “saved” France in two World Wars, why should let France and Saint-Pierre et Miquelon gain access to the continental shelf? The islands are surrounded by Canadian waters. Why should they gain access to the continental shelf? The 1992 arbitration was final, why is Saint-Pierre et Miquelon and France [...]